A court has to decide if a police officer’s actions rise to the level of reckless disregard for the safety of others.

A home invasion case recently decided by the Court of Appeals in the State of Michigan involved the use of video from a security camera entered into evidence.

A court has to decide whether or not a malfunctioning smoke alarm was the fault of the manufacturer or intentional disablement.

Before entering the house from the garage, the defendant announced his and the K-9’s presence and ordered anyone in the house to surrender or they would be bitten by the dog.

A party that signs a document is conclusively bound by its terms absent a valid excuse for having failed to read it.

Following the unfortunate death of a woman who had activated a PERS alarm, a jury will decide the damages. 

At issue is a contractual provision whereby an insured waives the right of their insurance carrier to seek redress or seek compensation for losses from a negligent third party.

An alarm company allegedly failed to obtain the required approvals before disarming a customer’s video surveillance system.

State legislatures are enacting consumer data privacy laws, which provide consumers with more choice over how companies acquire and utilize their personal data.

A plaintiff argued that the terms of an original alarm services agreement were immaterial because it wasn’t suing on the contract, but on tort and implied warranty theories.